Strict Standards: Declaration of KHttpUri::set() should be compatible with KObject::set($property, $value = NULL) in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/koowa/http/uri.php on line 454

Strict Standards: Declaration of KHttpUri::get() should be compatible with KObject::get($property = NULL, $default = NULL) in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/koowa/http/uri.php on line 454

Strict Standards: Non-static method JLoader::register() should not be called statically in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/joomla/cache/cache.php on line 19

Strict Standards: Declaration of JCacheStorage::get() should be compatible with JObject::get($property, $default = NULL) in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/joomla/cache/storage.php on line 173

Strict Standards: Non-static method JLoader::register() should not be called statically in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/joomla/document/document.php on line 19

Strict Standards: Non-static method JLoader::import() should not be called statically in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/loader.php on line 186

Strict Standards: Non-static method JLoader::import() should not be called statically in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/loader.php on line 186

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/koowa/http/uri.php:454) in /www/htdocs/w006b358/templates/ja_purity_ii/libs/ja.template.helper.php on line 130
Navies Ask: What Do You Do With A Captured Pirate?

Bushdrums.com

You are here: Bush-Talk Forum Edit my Forum Profile Forums General Information Political Topics Navies Ask: What Do You Do With A Captured Pirate?

Strict Standards: Declaration of ComNinjaHelperDefault::__call() should be compatible with KObject::__call($method, array $arguments) in /www/htdocs/w006b358/administrator/components/com_ninja/helpers/default.php on line 19

Strict Standards: Declaration of KControllerAbstract::__call() should be compatible with KObject::__call($method, array $arguments) in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/koowa/controller/abstract.php on line 24

Strict Standards: Declaration of KViewTemplate::__call() should be compatible with KObject::__call($method, array $arguments) in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/koowa/view/template.php on line 22

Strict Standards: Declaration of KModelAbstract::__call() should be compatible with KObject::__call($method, array $arguments) in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/koowa/model/abstract.php on line 19

Strict Standards: Non-static method JLoader::register() should not be called statically in /www/htdocs/w006b358/administrator/components/com_ninja/models/settings.php on line 10

Strict Standards: Non-static method JLoader::import() should not be called statically in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/loader.php on line 186

Strict Standards: Declaration of ComNinjaboardDatabaseTableSettings::_getDefaultsFromXML() should be compatible with ComNinjaDatabaseTableSettings::_getDefaultsFromXML() in /www/htdocs/w006b358/administrator/components/com_ninjaboard/databases/tables/settings.php on line 20

Strict Standards: Declaration of ComNinjaboardDatabaseTableAssets::insert() should be compatible with KDatabaseTableAbstract::insert(KDatabaseRowInterface $row) in /www/htdocs/w006b358/administrator/components/com_ninjaboard/databases/tables/assets.php on line 41

Strict Standards: Declaration of ComNinjaboardTemplateHelperPaginator::pagination() should be compatible with ComNinjaHelperPaginator::pagination($config = Array) in /www/htdocs/w006b358/components/com_ninjaboard/templates/helpers/paginator.php on line 13

Strict Standards: Non-static method JLoader::import() should not be called statically in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/loader.php on line 186

Navies Ask: What Do You Do With A Captured Pirate?

Link to this post 18 Apr 09

Navies ask: What do you do with a captured pirate?

Associated Press
Katharine Houreld & Mike Corder, AP Writers
NAIROBI, Kenya

The scrawny teenage pirate stormed the Maersk Alabama hoping for a share of a $3 million ransom. He was attacked by its sailors, stabbed in the hand and tied up, and later arrested by the U.S. Navy.

The wound probably saved the life of Abduhl Wal-i-Musi, who was taken aboard the USS Bainbridge for medical treatment before snipers killed his three comrades holding American skipper Richard Phillips hostage in a lifeboat.

Now Wal-i-Musi awaits a flight to the United States for trial - a rare instance of a piracy case advancing through the justice system.

French government officials say the Jean de Vienne, background, intercepted and captured 19 pirates as they tried to take over two cargo ships. Many captured Somali pirates once were freed because nations feared the complications of putting them on trial. But the world is now grappling with how to prosecute the bandits -- and even considering a special tribunal.

On Friday, April 10, the French navy freed the sailboat and its hostages. Two pirates were killed. Three pirates were captured and are to be brought to France for criminal proceedings. Many captured Somali pirates once were freed because nations feared the complications of putting them on trial. But the world is now grappling with how to prosecute the bandits -- and even considering a special tribunal.

In fact, most pirates plucked from the seas by warships of differenct countries are simply set free because of the many pitfalls along the path to prosecution.

"Prosecuting detained pirates - that is simply not our business," said Cmdr. Achim Winkler of a European Union flotilla that has nine warships and three maritime patrol planes guarding shipping lanes in the Gulf of Aden.

As the world grapples with the scourge of piracy in the busy waters off the Horn of Africa, the United States and other countries are calling for the bandits to be held accountable. Some even are considering a special tribunal.

A Kenya-based diplomat of another country that patrols those waters says putting pirates on trial is "still a lot of hassle." Pirate boats are often destroyed to prevent the pirates from getting back to sea, but unless they're caught in the act his navy's policy is to set the marauders free.

"While nobody would advocate the ancient naval tradition of just making them walk the gangplank, equipment like GPSes, weapons (and) ladders are often just tossed overboard and the pirates let go," said the diplomat, who asked that his name not be used because he is not authorized to speak to reporters.

What happens to captured pirates often depends on the nationalities of their victims and the navy that detained them. French soldiers take pirates who have attacked French citizens to Paris; pirates who have attacked other nations are hauled to Kenya, such as the 11 seized when the French navy found them stalking a Lebanese-owned ship this week. India took 24 suspects to Yemen, since half were from there.

The Dutch took five suspects to Rotterdam, where they probably will be tried next month under a 17th century law against "sea robbery" in the attack of the Dutch Antilles-flagged ship Samanyulo in January.

The crew fired a flare that set the pirates' speedboat on fire. They jumped into the sea, and the Danish navy picked them up and sank what was left of the boat. After agreeing to take the case, Dutch investigators interviewed sailors on the freighter to make the case against the pirates.

Among the difficulties facing prosecutors is assembling witnesses scattered across the globe and finding translators in various languages. Other countries are wary of hauling in pirates for trial for fear of being saddled with them after they serve their prison terms.

Some European nations dump detained pirates back into lawless Somalia, said Pottengal Mukundan, director of the Commercial Crimes Services of the International Maritime Bureau.

"I think EU countries are concerned that if the pirates are convicted and spend time in prison, when they finish their sentence, they may not be able to send them back to Somalia," Mukundan said.

Kenya is the most popular destination for suspects. The East African nation bordering Somalia has agreements with the U.S., EU and Britain to prosecute Somali pirates, leading to a slew of court cases in the southern port of Mombasa.

But diplomats privately fear that if every suspect is brought to Kenya, it could take years to prosecute because of a backlog of 800,000 cases of all kinds in the country's courts. Some suspects must spend a year or more in jail just to get a hearing.

Kenya's Foreign Ministry said Friday it is studying a proposal to establish a special tribunal but likely would expect richer countries to foot the bills. Mark Ellis, executive director of the International Bar Association, said Kenya would almost certainly need help.

"I don't think the hurdles are insurmountable, but it will take a much more structured and aggressive approach by the international community to assist Kenya in undertaking this type of trial," Ellis said.

Britain, the U.S., Germany and France have brought suspects to Kenya, which convicted 10 pirates arrested by U.S. sailors last year. Each is serving a sentence of seven years - the maximum.

Francis Kadima, a Kenyan who represents seven Somalis accused of attacking a Norwegian-owned vessel in February, said his clients are innocent fishermen who will challenge the legality of being brought to Kenya.

"That agreement is not legally binding" because it has not been ratified by Kenya's parliament, he said, adding: "We will also raise the issue of jurisdiction, since they were not arrested in Kenyan waters."

Kenneth Randall, dean of the University of Alabama School of Law, said Kenyan courts may be able to invoke the concept of universal jurisdiction used to justify prosecuting slavers, torturers and perpetrators of other heinous crimes.

"Piracy was the original crime that was subject to universal jurisdiction," he said. "Pirates were viewed as stateless, piracy was committed on the high seas where no one nation state has jurisdiction, and they committed heinous acts that disrupted world commerce at a time when it was mainly conducted on the high seas."

Jurisdiction questions can lead to problems: The U.S. Navy once held a suspect on a ship for seven months largely due to confusion over where he would be prosecuted.

Wal-i-Musi could have been sent to Kenya, but the U.S. decision to prosecute him in New York could be a sign of Washington's determination to bring pirates to justice.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton emphasized that determination Wednesday when she unveiled an anti-piracy strategy that includes trying to seize their assets.

"These pirates are criminals. They are armed gangs on the sea. And those plotting attacks must be stopped," she said.

A U.S. official said Wal-i-Musi will face trial in New York, where the FBI has a history of handling African cases involving major crimes against Americans, including the 1998 al-Qaida bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he is not authorized to talk about an ongoing investigation.

Farah Yara of the pirate haven of Haradhere, Somalia, told The Associated Press he knows Wal-i-Musi and described him as just another youngster from a fishing family "duped into going to sea to hijack ships."

Prosecutors have not yet said what charges Wal-i-Musi will face. The United States has old piracy laws on its books and new terrorism statutes that could be used, said attorney Matthew Thomas, who trains the U.S. Navy in commercial maritime law.

Michael Passman, a Chicago lawyer who has written about piracy law, said it has been more than 100 years since the United States used the statutes, and prosecutors could use other federal laws against crimes at sea.

But, he said, "this is a case where the traditional piracy statute fits so well what has been alleged against this individual."

He said the United States also might want to set a precedent to show pirates they face stern penalties and to serve as an example to other nations.

The law is written in a way that makes it sound as if life in prison is the only option for a piracy conviction, Passman said. Piracy was punished by death in the 1700s and early 1800s, but since at least 1819, it has carried a life sentence, he said.

John J. Byrnes, head of the Manhattan office of the Federal Defenders of New York, said it has more than a dozen lawyers to handle piracy cases just as it handled terrorism and fraud cases.

"We're aware of this case in the sense we've heard it may come in early next week," he said, adding that based on reports that Wal-i-Musi is a teenager, age could be a factor.

Byrnes was one of two lawyers who represented Mohammad Salameh, the first defendant charged in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. Salameh is serving life in prison.

Associated Press writers contributing to this report include Michelle Faul and Malkhadir M. Muhumed in Nairobi, Larry Neumeister in New York, Jennifer Barchfield in Paris and Devlin Barrett in Washington.

Article at: http://www.kentucky.com/513/story/763863-p2.html

Link to this post 18 Apr 09

Why Kenya must not be used to dump suspected pirates

Daily Nation
By PETER MWAURA
Friday, April 17 2009


There are many reasons Kenya must not be used as a judicial dumping ground for suspected Somali pirates. Not the least important is the fact that Kenyan courts are already overstretched by a massive domestic caseload and the prisons are overcrowded.

Currently, more than two dozen Somalis arrested by foreign powers are being held at Mombasa’s Shimo la Tewa maximum-security prison. The prison is overcrowded to three times its capacity. In the coming weeks, we can expect the arrival of more suspects.

Using Kenya to try Somali piracy suspects began in 2006 when the US Navy handed over 10 of them accused of hijacking an Indian dhow. The suspects could as well have been tried in the US or India.

The UK followed suit by signing, in December 2008, a secret memorandum of understanding with the Kenya Government, and the Royal Navy brought to Mombasa eight men charged with trying to hijack a Danish ship.

THE US AND THE EUROPEAN UNION followed with similar pacts.

But the agreements are turning Kenya into a dumpsite for piracy suspects nobody wants and who, besides overburdening our judicial system, are posing critical questions if the transfer is legal and if the suspects will get justice.

The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, which is often described as the “constitution of the oceans”, suggests that the transfer is illegal.

Article 105 provides that the prosecution be by “the courts of the state which carried out the seizure.”

The provision was clearly intended to preclude the Kenya-type transfers. The convention defines piracy as an act taking place on the high seas. If it takes place in territorial waters, it is simply robbery.

There are also questions about the security and political risks for Kenya in trying suspects whose alleged crime was not committed on Kenya’s territorial waters or against its vessels. Is Kenya being set up to reap all the anger that would normally be directed against the arresting maritime powers?

Kenya has a large and economically powerful Somali community. It has even been suggested that some of the ransom paid to Somali pirates, running into millions of dollars, has found its way into the Kenyan economy.

It has also been suggested that the Somali pirates do not operate alone, and may have links to warlords, Islamic militias, or even terrorist groups such as al Qaeda.

Does Kenya really want to set itself up as the world’s unofficial criminal court for Somali piracy suspects?

The suspects, it is further suggested, are heroes in their own country. The genesis of the piracy lends credence to this.
Many of pirates started off as a kind of coast guard that protected Somali territorial waters from illegal fishing by foreign trawlers and dumping of toxic waste by foreign companies.

Despite these troubling questions, the US, the UK and Germany have nonchalantly handed over suspects for trial in Kenya and turned Mombasa into The Hague. Kenya bears the brunt without the real benefits that should go with the hosting of such an international criminal court.

The Western maritime powers are not interested in trying suspected pirates in their own countries. It is too expensive, politically unattractive and could cause jurisdictional difficulties.

SOME OF THEM ARE ALSO HESITANT to prosecute the suspects because, should the trials fail, they could claim political asylum.

In 2008, for example, the British Foreign Office advised the Royal Navy not to detain suspected pirates from countries that could enable them to claim asylum in Britain under its human rights law.

So Kenya can expect to continue getting all the unwanted piracy suspects. It is unlikely, however, that the US will want to hand over the lone surviving Somali “pirate” captured on Sunday when the US Navy rescued the captain of mv Maersk Alabama by killing three other Somali pirates.

He is too valuable a catch. The Obama Administration will most likely want to prosecute this high-profile case at home to enjoy all the political capital and favourable publicity associated with it.

gigirimwaura@yahoo.com

Article at: http://www.nation.co.ke/oped/Opinion/-/440808/561166/-/459d42/-/

You are here Bush-Talk Forum Edit my Forum Profile Forums General Information Political Topics Navies Ask: What Do You Do With A Captured Pirate?