Hi Mirushaa
A very warm WELCOME from me and great yiou found us!
Hopefully you become a loyal bushdrummer! Would be wonderful to get some inputs from a younger member !
I have not read the other posts in order to write mine as unbiased as possible.....[/color]
how does overcrowded safari affect wildlife and nature?
> Overcrowded, overpopulation brings enormous stress to the animals. Particularly regarding their hunting >tactics, failure and success rates. We have seen that in the Massai Mara where Cheetahs, normally used >to hunt in the early morning hours and late afternoon, have changed their hunting tactics to hunt during >the hot hours of the day (11am to 15pm) as that's the time when safari vehicles get back to camps and >lodges for their siesta.
>Safari vehicles interfere with hunts following the cats and making prey aware of their presence.
>Furthermore off-road driving as allowed in private game reserves has an enormous impact onto the flora, >ground-nesting birds, reptiles etc.
do you think that properly organized tourism can protect nature and wildlife?
> revenue sourced from tourism of course enables governments to pay for game warden, fencing if >necessary, anti poaching units, building nature conscious infrastructure, maintaining rest camps etc.
>But the evaluation how many camps within one reserve should be allowed is regrettably very much >depending not only animal and nature in mind but mostly in view to profit.
what kinds of tourism can be considered as nature-friendly?
> Unmotorized tourism would be the choice but it's still not available. LONDOLOZI in South Africa is >currently testing a game drive vehicle which is totally nature friendly - zero emissions, well mostly as still >electricity (wall plug) is needed. And as long as this eletricity doesn't come from solar power there is still >some kind of emission. But it's a start.............
http://www.londolozi.com/conservation_at_londolozi/a_londolozi_original/
Here are some very good thoughts:
http://www.londolozi.com/conservation_at_londolozi/22nd_century_and_beyond
>The whole safari industry and foremost its clients have to re-switch their doings. Getting down with >expectations regarding game drives and the emission that causes and whether they do off-roading.
>Why client's have to re-think: It's the clients who request off-roading. Some even go so far to not visit >game reserves where off-roading isn't permittet.
can eco safari limit damages made on wildlife and nature? and how?
> - use of environmentally friendly vehicles
> - no offroad driving
> - water management/waste water management
> - waste management
> - solar power in tents/rooms instead of electricity also for battery charging
> - bucket showers instead of running water
> - abandon charcoal for water heating or cocking. production of charcoal has lead to the deforestation in >many parts of Africa. Foremost here to mention the Mau forest/Kenya. But that problem exists all over!
> - refill of water bottles (mark with names) instead of handing out new ones
> - Abandon "spas" in the bush as well as "plunge pools" in front of every tent/suite. The spa-idea was
> born at the end of the 90s and now every camp/lodge which wants to earn really big money introduces > such nonsens in order to become more "luxurious" justifying insane bed night rates by the offer of such > "invcentives" mostly in dry bone areas.
> - no swimmingpools in dry areas
> - no game flights (aircraft as well as helicopter)
> - no motorized watersports in areas like St. Lucia/South Africa or Okavango Delta/Botswana e.g.
> - no golf course in water sensitive areas
Can be eco safari considered as the way how to preserve nature?
> Eco Safari can only be considered if all involved are pulling a rope into the same direction!
> . That starts with the flights. If we have to fly to Africa we can nowadays contribute towards nature
> conservation by paying a emission fee calculated on the miles we fly.
> . only choose camps and lodges which consider environmentally friendly pratises as described above.
> . Travel agents have to be more educated and informed on venues regarding environmentally friendly management.
> . Traven agents should make sure no camps and lodges are booked which are involved in trophy hunting. > That hunting leads to decreased number of big cats for example. The decrease leeds to a very limited
> gene pool which leads to extrem vulnerability of the cats regarding diseases.
> . Any venue which allows lion or leopards cubs to be petted or conducts lion walks must be boycoted as
> the cubs go straight to "canned hunting farms" (hunting in samll enclosures where animals cannot
> escape, some are traquilized in order to be hunted) after they have grown out of the age for such
> activities which is when they get to dangerous (between 12 and 20 months of age)
> . Elephant Back Safaris (EBS) should be abandoned as the request for these safaris lead companies to
> capture tiny elephants from wild herds in order to train tghem brutally for their safaris.
To wrap it: ECO safaris can only be done if there is no animal abuse involved, no off-roading, water/waste water and waste management, limited number of vehicles/bed in one reserve so that pressures is taken away from animals. Only a small number of vehicles should be allowed for a limited time (2 cars/10 min. - then pull out!)
Particularly in view to eco - it's always a question of education. Sprteading the "wisdom" or knowledge and making people aware. Ignorance and lack of knowledge about those things is mostly the reason for being NOT eco-friendly paired with greed to make a quick and easy buck.
If something else comes to my mind I'll post here.
So check occasionally!
Success with your project!
And yes - safari guide is a great profession but the person who is focusing onto that profession must have a great PASSION for the bush! If you feel that passion: Go for it!