Last night on a news television program (Sixty Minutes) they ran a short segment about the gorillas which have been maimed and slaughtered by guerillas in the "civil unrest" in the Congo. Also included as aggressors are the charcoal burners(they stated that making charcoal is a huge business). All very complicated and political as officials being paid off to turn a blind eye - the game wardens, protectors of the Apes understaffed and underarmed. The gorillas just caught in the middle of it all.
One thing that caught my attention was the description of the apes - in that they had become acclimated to humans as researchers and tourists frequent the area for work and pleasure. And in that they have become acclimated they no longer perceive humans as a threat - making them easy targets for poachers, warmakers, and those in big business (charcoal making) who wish to make a statement.
I am still trying to formulate the questions swirling around in my head. I admire those who do the research, and work to protect various species. I understand that gorilla treks make for big money to support further research and protection. But there is a niggling at the back of my brain that the acclimating of these beasts has contributed to their destruction. Don't mean to start a great debate - but would like others' thoughts.