Strict Standards: Declaration of KHttpUri::set() should be compatible with KObject::set($property, $value = NULL) in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/koowa/http/uri.php on line 454

Strict Standards: Declaration of KHttpUri::get() should be compatible with KObject::get($property = NULL, $default = NULL) in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/koowa/http/uri.php on line 454

Strict Standards: Non-static method JLoader::register() should not be called statically in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/joomla/cache/cache.php on line 19

Strict Standards: Declaration of JCacheStorage::get() should be compatible with JObject::get($property, $default = NULL) in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/joomla/cache/storage.php on line 173

Strict Standards: Non-static method JLoader::register() should not be called statically in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/joomla/document/document.php on line 19

Strict Standards: Non-static method JLoader::import() should not be called statically in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/loader.php on line 186

Strict Standards: Non-static method JLoader::import() should not be called statically in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/loader.php on line 186

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/koowa/http/uri.php:454) in /www/htdocs/w006b358/templates/ja_purity_ii/libs/ja.template.helper.php on line 130
Extract from the Game Rangers Association of Africa newsletter

Bushdrums.com

You are here: Forums General Information Wildlife Topics Extract from the Game Rangers Association of Africa newsletter

Strict Standards: Declaration of ComNinjaHelperDefault::__call() should be compatible with KObject::__call($method, array $arguments) in /www/htdocs/w006b358/administrator/components/com_ninja/helpers/default.php on line 19

Strict Standards: Declaration of KControllerAbstract::__call() should be compatible with KObject::__call($method, array $arguments) in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/koowa/controller/abstract.php on line 24

Strict Standards: Declaration of KViewTemplate::__call() should be compatible with KObject::__call($method, array $arguments) in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/koowa/view/template.php on line 22

Strict Standards: Declaration of KModelAbstract::__call() should be compatible with KObject::__call($method, array $arguments) in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/koowa/model/abstract.php on line 19

Strict Standards: Non-static method JLoader::register() should not be called statically in /www/htdocs/w006b358/administrator/components/com_ninja/models/settings.php on line 10

Strict Standards: Non-static method JLoader::import() should not be called statically in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/loader.php on line 186

Strict Standards: Declaration of ComNinjaboardDatabaseTableSettings::_getDefaultsFromXML() should be compatible with ComNinjaDatabaseTableSettings::_getDefaultsFromXML() in /www/htdocs/w006b358/administrator/components/com_ninjaboard/databases/tables/settings.php on line 20

Strict Standards: Declaration of ComNinjaboardDatabaseTableAssets::insert() should be compatible with KDatabaseTableAbstract::insert(KDatabaseRowInterface $row) in /www/htdocs/w006b358/administrator/components/com_ninjaboard/databases/tables/assets.php on line 41

Strict Standards: Declaration of ComNinjaboardTemplateHelperPaginator::pagination() should be compatible with ComNinjaHelperPaginator::pagination($config = Array) in /www/htdocs/w006b358/components/com_ninjaboard/templates/helpers/paginator.php on line 13

Strict Standards: Non-static method JLoader::import() should not be called statically in /www/htdocs/w006b358/libraries/loader.php on line 186

Extract from the Game Rangers Association of Africa newsletter

Link to this post 09 Jul 07

An extract from the Game Rangers Assoc.

US Animal Rights Groups are Destroying Kenya’s Wildlife

Dr. Laurence Frank, from the University of California, Berkeley and the

Wildlife Conservation Society, has studied predators in Kenya for 37 years.

He runs the Living With Lions project, working on lion conservation outside

of national parks. He is not a big game hunter.

Once internationally famous for its magnificent wildlife, Kenya is in a

conservation crisis, due largely to the cynical and corrupt influence of the

International Fund for Animal Welfare, the US Humane Society and other

animal rights groups which spend millions to prevent rational conservation

policies that would benefit both wildlife and impoverished rural Africans.

Seventy percent of Kenya’s wildlife has died in the last thirty years,

strangled slowly in snares and sold as cheap, unidentified meat. Even

animals in national parks are in serious decline due to poaching and habitat

destruction on their boundaries. Lions are being speared and poisoned into

extinction.

In that same period, South Africa and Namibia saw an immense increase in

wildlife numbers, as over ten thousand ranches found that wildlife for

trophy hunting is more profitable than cattle. Wildlife in Zimbabwe

quadrupled with the growth of hunting on large conservancies, until Mugabe’s

‘land reform’ resulted in most of it being snared. Wildlife continues to

flourish in Tanzania, Botswana, and Zambia, where hunting contributes

significantly to national economies.

Sentimental love of animals is a luxury affordable by comfortable

westerners, but meaningless to the world’s poor and hungry. With

ever-increasing human numbers, wildlife in Africa is doomed unless it

produces income for rural people. That is not possible in Kenya because

retrogressive policies, bought by tragically naive American animal lovers,

ensure that rural people resent wildlife instead of profiting from it.

For rural Kenyans, wildlife is an unmitigated nuisance: lions kill precious

livestock, wildebeest and zebra compete with cattle for grazing, elephants

and buffalo destroy crops and occasionally kill people. While tourism brings

wealth to hotels and tour companies, virtually nothing reaches the rural

people who bear the costs of living with wildlife. Telling a Masai herdsman

that he should cherish wildlife is like telling an urban American that he

should cherish muggers and murderers.

Although unpalatable to many urban westerners, carefully regulated trophy

hunting is the one avenue through which wildlife can bring serious money to

rural Africans. Foreigners pay over two hundred million dollars for hunting

safaris elsewhere in Africa, taking old males with impressive horns, tusks

or manes, animals that are no longer of importance to the population (as any

man my age knows all too well). In North America, Europe, and southern

Africa, carefully managed hunting has greatly increased wildlife populations

because people value them.

Tanzania has set aside over 100,000 square miles of wilderness for hunting.

It has more wildlife than any country in Africa, and half the world’s

remaining lions. In Botswana, a very few male lions are shot every year,

earning $65,000 each for the rural community in which the lion was taken,

and half that amount for the national conservation agency. The community

profit would pay for 350 cattle taken by lions, or support teachers, nurses

or wildlife rangers. Lions and all the associated wildlife are a source of

income, to be valued and protected.

In Kenya, that lion is only a cattle-killing nuisance, to be poisoned and

left to rot in the sun. A rural community would earn far more from a single

old male impala shot as a trophy than a poacher earns from snaring an entire

breeding herd of females and young for bushmeat.

Kenya shut down legal hunting in 1977, when the world was outraged by

hunters’ reports of industrial scale poaching of elephants for ivory,

abetted by high government officials. The ban silenced the hunters and the

elephant slaughter continued. In the absence of the hunters’ anti-poaching

patrols, bushmeat snaring exploded. Vast regions of this country that

teemed with large mammals thirty years ago are now barren of any animal

bigger than a rabbit.

In spite of plummeting wildlife numbers, that failed policy has been

maintained by foreign animal rights groups. Whenever real conservationists

try to reform Kenyan policy to reverse the decline in wildlife, these groups

launch disinformation campaigns in the local press, relying on racial

resentment combined with outright fabrication: “Rich white foreigners want

to kill all the animals in our national parks; only rich whites will profit

from hunting”. They hire mobs to disrupt public policy meetings and fill

the press with nonsensical claims that hunters would indiscriminately

slaughter all game.

It is widely believed that these groups rely heavily on bribery, spending

huge sums to buy sympathetic media coverage for their propaganda, and to buy

influence at the highest levels of government. In a young democracy

struggling against entrenched corruption, large scale bribery by westerners

is stunningly irresponsible.

Worst of all, these ideologues apparently do not seem to care that millions

of animals die wretchedly in snares, so long as none are shot for profit.

They boast to their American supporters that their donations prevent hunting

in Kenya, never telling them that, as a result, there is little wildlife

left, either.

Link to this post 10 Jul 07

OK Bwanamich, now you've got me going!!!!

South Africa and Namibia saw an immense increase in wildlife numbers, as over ten thousand ranches found that wildlife for trophy hunting is more profitable than cattle

What the heck is the good in increasing wildlife numbers only to have them shot?

regulated trophy hunting is the one avenue through which wildlife can bring serious money to
rural Africans
.

Yes, a few of those rural Africans will get jobs in the hunting lodges and camps. However, I am not so stupid to believe that those not working for the camps will make any money from the camp owners. Those owning and managing the camps will get very rich, but those living in surrounding areas won't be much better off financially than they were before.

Foreigners pay over two hundred million dollars for hunting safaris elsewhere in Africa, taking old males with impressive horns, tusks or manes, animals that are no longer of importance to the population (as any
man my age knows all too well).
.

This truly shows Dr. Frank's ignorance. It is well known that female elephants will refuse to breed with the younger males. They want those 30 - 60 years of age. Thus if you go according to Dr. Frank's wishes allowing hunting of the older, bigger tusked males, the elephant population would come to a standstill!!

Tanzania has set aside over 100,000 square miles of wilderness for hunting.

This may well be true, but if that is the case, why are the Tanzanian poachers now coming into Kenya to get their elephants? (see article posted earlier today).

Worst of all, these ideologues apparently do not seem to care that millions of animals die wretchedly in snares, so long as none are shot for profit.

PURE BULL CRAP!!! It hurts just as much or more to see an elephant dying from infection from snare wounds, perhaps even more because the animals suffers for a much longer time, than thinking of a magnificant animal with a bullet through his/her skull. There have been only several times where I wish I had had a gun in my hand, and I would have used it against the "spearer" - not the animal.

By allowing hunting, increasing the animal population, therefore more human-wildlife conflict, it will mean only more unnecessary killing of wildlife, more money in the pockets of the hunters and hunting camp owners and still not much trickling down to the surrounding communities.

If and when men who have ideas like this also start talking about hunting humans and "culling" their excess populations, I cannot and will not believe them as being sincere in their wish to conserve wildlife, only benefit from it.

Link to this post 10 Jul 07

What the heck is the good in increasing wildlife numbers only to have them shot?

You still don't get it do you? Wildlife is a RENEWABLE RESOURCE!!! Just like a crop that is farmed, it can be "farmed". The yearly off-take through hunting is always less than the annual increase. The increase is a direct result of wildlife protection against poaching by the outfitters. While you are "harvesting" some animals by shooting them and raising revenue you are allowing the majority to increase their numbers.

Yes, a few of those rural Africans will get jobs in the hunting lodges and camps. However, I am not so stupid to believe that those not working for the camps will make any money from the camp owners. Those owning and managing the camps will get very rich, but those living in surrounding areas won't be much better off financially than they were before.

It is much more than that! Not ALL will benefit the same way not ALL benefit form state services; that much is true! When you build a school, a medical clinic, offer business start-up capital, and so on, you are benefiting more than just the employees of the outfitter Alleviating poverty is not only about money in the pocket!

This truly shows Dr. Frank's ignorance. It is well known that female elephants will refuse to breed with the younger males. They want those 30 - 60 years of age. Thus if you go according to Dr. Frank's wishes allowing hunting of the older, bigger tusked males, the elephant population would come to a standstill!!

First mistake is that you keep all your arguments about wildlife management and conservation to elephant! That is just one in many million of species affected. Dr. Frank was talking generally when he included "tusks" in his list. But to answer your query, between 30 and 60 years, there is 30 years where an adult male elephant can breed and pass on its genes multiple times. As one bull will breed with several different females every year, even shooting a male elephant at 35 or 40 years of age would not be harmful to the reproduction cycle of a population. Elephants are known to be prolific breeders and the population increase witnessed in Botswana, Kruger and Zimbabwe are witness to this. Shooting less than 0.5% of a population WILL NEVER cause it to come to a stand still. Doesn't matter which way you look at it!

This may well be true, but if that is the case, why are the Tanzanian poachers now coming into Kenya to get their elephants? (see article posted earlier today).

see my post in the respective thread. The KWS statement is pure hogwash!

PURE BULL CRAP!!! It hurts just as much or more to see an elephant dying from infection from snare wounds, perhaps even more because the animals suffers for a much longer time, than thinking of a magnificant animal with a bullet through his/her skull. There have been only several times where I wish I had had a gun in my hand, and I would have used it against the "spearer" - not the animal.

You may be right but you can't deny that all animal rights propaganda is focused around FORBIDDING HUNTING and rarely mentions other causes of wildlife death such as bush-meat trade, habitat destruction, human-wildlife conflict, etc. It serves thier money raising agenda's to focus on "BAD HUNTERS". This what is PURE BULL CRAP!

By allowing hunting, increasing the animal population, therefore more human-wildlife conflict, it will mean only more unnecessary killing of wildlife, more money in the pockets of the hunters and hunting camp owners and still not much trickling down to the surrounding communities.

I thought increasing animal numbers was the desired result? After 30 years of non-hunting, Kenya's wildlife is at an all time low. Why? It can't be blamed on hunting as there was none! Majority of wildlife experts use the "Kenya example" as the wrong way to conserve wildlife. Sadly, I agree.

If and when men who have ideas like this also start talking about hunting humans and "culling" their excess populations, I cannot and will not believe them as being sincere in their wish to conserve wildlife, only benefit from it.

Come on! Nature is all based around "survival of the fittest" and the "food chain". Man's right on earth is equal to any other living creature. HOWEVER, we have the capacity to manipulate wildlife to serve our own needs FIrST and preserve it for future generations at the same time! Actually, Man is doing a pretty good job at "culling" itself through war and disease.

Link to this post 10 Jul 07

Ooops didn't come out how I expected but it should still be understandable...

You are here Forums General Information Wildlife Topics Extract from the Game Rangers Association of Africa newsletter